Connect with us
       

MXGP World Championship

Stat Sheet: MXGP of Switzerland

News, notes, stats and facts.

Published

on

There is so much that goes on at each FIM Motocross World Championship round that it is inevitable that you will overlook certain things. That is where our regular ‘Stat Sheet’ feature comes into play, however, as we focus on the details that you may have overlooked.

MXGP

Holeshot (Moto One)

Antonio Cairoli

Best Times (Moto One)

Antonio Cairoli

1:54.319

Jeffrey Herlings

1:54.344

Romain Febvre

1:54.704

Clement Desalle

1:54.966

Glenn Coldenhoff

1:5.833

Laps Led (Moto One)

Jeffrey Herlings

17

Enlarge

Site-Jeffrey-Herlings-12
Jeffrey Herlings has led three hundred and twenty-five laps this season.

KTM Images/Ray Archer

Holeshot (Moto Two)

Julien Lieber

Best Times (Moto Two)

Jeffrey Herlings

1:53.548

Romain Febvre

1:53.843

Clement Desalle

1:54.295

Tim Gajser

1:54.669

Max Anstie

1:54.819

– Whenever Jeffrey Herlings gets out front early on, he lays down some blistering laps that give him an advantage that he can maintain through the second half of the moto. The first encounter at the Grand Prix of Switzerland followed that pattern. Herlings was in the lead by the end of lap one and clearly faster than his competition. If you are looking for proof, peruse the times below. This table compares him to Clement Desalle, who was in second at the time.

Jeffrey Herlings

Clement Desalle

Difference

Lap 1

1:55.413

1:56.598

-1.185

Lap 2

1:55.222

1:55.810

-0.588

Lap 3

1:54.489

1:55.237

-0.748

Lap 4

1:54.344

1:54.966

 -0.622

Lap 5

1:56.056

1:55.957

 +0.099

Lap 6

1:55.922

1:55.994

-0.072

Lap 7

1:54.762

1:56.664

 -1.902

– The second race was very different. Although Clement Desalle led initially, Jeffrey Herlings and Romain Febvre were the quickest riders on track. Febvre actually forced the issue more than anyone else across the first five laps, which deserves recognition, but then something clicked with Herlings, who dropped the hammer and sprinted away. Herlings set his best times of the race on laps seven and eight. Those occurred right after he took the lead for the first time.

Jeffrey Herlings

Romain Febvre

Difference

Lap 2

1:55.000

1:55.057

-0.o57

Lap 3

1:54.347

1:54.016

+0.331

Lap 4

1:55.217

1:53.843

 +1.374

Lap 5

1:56.236

1:55.397

 +0.839

Lap 6

1:54.312

1:56.373

 -2.061

Lap 7

1:53.571

1:54.634

-1.063

Lap 8

1:53.548

1:54.201

-0.653

Enlarge

Site-Jeffrey-Herlings-2-4
Jeffrey Herlings is sat on an advantage of fifty-eight points currently.

KTM Images/Ray Archer

– Following yet another clean sweep, Jeffrey Herlings is sat on seven hundred and thirty-three points in the championship standings. When was the last time that the series leader had that many points after sixteen rounds? Bear in mind that Herlings scored no points at round eleven in June. Amazingly, Stefan Everts was the last one to do it. There were only fifteen rounds in 2006, admittedly, but he ended the season with seven hundred and thirty-nine points to his name. It is surprising that Antonio Cairoli has never been this dominant though, right?

– Speaking of Antonio Cairoli, the way that he has performed this season actually deserves some credit. Cairoli won the championship in a convincing fashion a year ago, as everyone knows, but only had six hundred and thirty-one points at this point in the season. Even though Cairoli has won two events this season and faced health troubles, he has six hundred and seventy-five points to his name. The level is that much higher at the moment.

– Jeffrey Herlings has now won in Switzerland twice. How many times has he won in a country just twice? It has happened in Brazil, Mexico, Bulgaria, Sweden, Finland, Spain, Argentina, USA and Indonesia! It is quite the list. Bulgaria could be removed from that list if he manages to stand atop the podium on Sunday and that is obviously quite likely. Bulgaria would then be in the same group as Belgium, Czechia and Great Britain as countries that he has won in three times.

– A championship has actually already been clinched in the FIM Motocross World Championship. KTM have already won the manufacturer title in the premier division! Two hundred and thirty-five points is the advantage that they have over Kawasaki in second. There are only two hundred points available at the final four rounds, so it is mathematically impossible for another manufacturer to catch the guys in orange.

Enlarge

Site-Antonio-Cairoli-7
Antonio Cairoli has put up a great fight at every round. It's not over yet.

KTM Images/Ray Archer

– Romain Febvre has had a very solid season. It has not been amazing, but it has been good. It is actually quite surprising that the Grand Prix of Switzerland marked just the third time that he has landed up on the box this season and the first time that he has finished higher than third overall! Febvre last finished in second overall, the position that he acquired on Sunday, at the Grand Prix of The Netherlands last year. There were three hundred and forty-five days between those two events.

– The intensity that Romain Febvre had in the second moto is highlighted earlier in this feature. However, in order to recognise the potential that he had in Switzerland, it is important to reflect on the qualifying race that took place on Saturday. Febvre moved from sixth to second throughout the race and crossed the line just four seconds behind the series leader. The lap times that he recorded towards the end of the race were really quite impressive.

Antonio Cairoli

Romain Febvre

Difference

Lap 6

1:54.672

1:53.075

+1.597

Lap 7

1:53.788

1:53.675

+0.1113

Lap 8

1:52.950

1:52.591

 -0.001

Lap 9

1:54.613

1:56.074

 -1.461

Lap 10

1:53.609

1:53.815

-0.206

Lap 11

1:55.613

1:53.271

+0.342

Lap 12

1:55.027

1:56.360

 -1.333

– Romain Febvre also acquired a season-best moto finish of second in the final moto at the Grand Prix of Switzerland. Who else achieved a personal best in Switzerland? Tanel Leok (twelfth) and Klemen Gercar (twentieth) were the only other guys. The veterans can still get the job done!

Enlarge

Site-Romain-Febvre
Romain Febvre had his best race in quite some time at the Swiss MXGP.

Monster Energy Media/Ray Archer

– This may be the most surprising statistic in this entire feature. Shaun Simpson finished in the top ten in both motos at the Grand Prix of Switzerland, which proves that he is still making progress, but when was the last time that he actually did that at a round? It was at Teutschenthal in May 2016! Eight hundred and thirty-five days passed between that event and Frauenfeld-Gachnang. There is no doubt that he belongs near the front.

– Kevin Strijbos also finished inside of the top ten in both motos for the first time this season, so had a positive showing. The drought that he experienced was not quite as long as Shaun Simpson though. Strijbos ended in the top ten in both motos at the final round last year, which was only three hundred and thirty-eight days ago. It is positive that he is starting to show flashes of his former self, because it is likely that his international career will draw to a close at the end of the current term.         

MX2

– The Grand Prix of Switzerland was reminiscent of the races that were run earlier in the season, as Jorge Prado and Pauls Jonass engaged in a game of cat and mouse. The battle in the opening moto was really exciting, as Prado claimed the holeshot and then failed to sprint away. It is easy to say that Jonass had the upper hand, seeing as he won that particular duel, but their times really were close at points. The table below highlights that.

Pauls Jonass

Jorge Prado

Difference

Lap 1

1:57.834

1:58.384

-0.550

Lap 2

1:57.716

1:57.193

+0.523

Lap 3

1:55.675

1:55.947

-0.272

Lap 4

1:56.491

1:56.584

 -0.093

Lap 5

1:57.278

1:57.271

+0.007

Lap 6

1:56.640

1:58.507

 -1.867

Lap 7

1:57.060

1:57.849

-0.789

– The second race was quite intriguing, as Jorge Prado jumped out into the early lead and sprinted. Pauls Jonass started to close in at the halfway point though and it seemed as though he was going to mount an attack. The rate that he closed in arguably made this his most impressive ride in a couple of months. A mistake eventually cost him a shot at the win though. Those times are covered in the table below.

Jorge Prado

Pauls Jonass

Difference

Lap 7

1:56.925

1:56.479

 +0.446

Lap 8

1:57.261

1:56.238

 +0.023

Lap 9

1:57.611

1:55.634

 +1.977

Lap 10

1:56.495

1:56.392

 +0.103

Lap 11

1:57.739

1:57.132

 +0.607

Lap 12

1:57.484

1:57.363

+0.121

Lap 13

1:57.682

1:57.128

 +0.554

Enlarge

Site-Pauls-Jonass-6
Jorge Prado has claimed twenty-one of the thirty holeshots this season.

KTM Images/Ray Archer

– Jorge Prado has won four rounds in succession at this point (Asia, Czechia, Belgium and Switzerland) and that streak is significant for a handful of different reasons. It has helped him to build an advantage of twenty-eight points, which is obviously important to him, and become the winningest rider in MX2 currently. Prado has claimed twelve overall victories in his career, whereas Pauls Jonass has eleven to his name. The Grand Prix of Switzerland was where Prado leapt past his teammate in the record books.

– Winning four rounds in succession is the greatest streak that Jorge Prado has had, but it is something that Pauls Jonass has never quite achieved. Jonass won three events at the start of this season but did not quite make it to four. Considering that the reigning world champion only has four races left in his MX2 career, it is likely that he will not hit that number for a couple of years. Heck, it may never happen unless he becomes a dominant force in the premier division!

– A final point on Jorge Prado and Pauls Jonass. The pair have obviously been the best riders in the class this season, but how often have the results actually shown that? Prado and Jonass have finished in first and second, in whatever order, in thirteen of the thirty races that have been run thus far. It is not hard to see why Red Bull KTM have been so dominant this year. There is no doubt that they will occupy the top two spots a few more times before the final chequered flag waves.

Enlarge

Site-Pauls-Jonass-7
Pauls Jonass trails Jorge Prado by twenty-eight with four rounds left.

KTM Images/Ray Archer

– There have been lots of comments about Thomas Kjer Olsen hitting a sophomore slump this season, as success has been limited since he climbed atop the podium in Latvia in May. Things are better than last year though, as he has had two podiums (France and Belgium) since his triumph. There were no more podium finishes after his sole win in Latvia last year, in comparison, so things are improving, just not at the rate that some expect.  

– The average finishes that Thomas Kjer Olsen has garnered do not exactly give that impression though. Following his win at the Grand Prix of Latvia last year, he had an average-race finish of seventh through the remaining motos. Whereas this season, in comparison, he has had an average finish of eighth since that moment that he heard the Danish national anthem. There is obviously still a lot of time for him to turn things around and lower the figure. The double DNF in Great Britain hurt him as well.

– The battle for third in the championship, a spot that Thomas Kjer Olsen holds, is heating up, although it may not seem that way. Ben Watson, Calvin Vlaanderen and Thomas Covington have scored better than Olsen a lot lately and therefore the gap has shrunk. The points that were acquired from the British Grand Prix on offer an intriguing look at the way that momentum has shifted and how this intriguing battle is developing. Those points are listed below.

Thomas Covington

318

Calvin Vlaanderen

266

Ben Watson

236

Thomas Kjer Olsen

231

Enlarge

Site-Thomas-Covington-2
Thomas Covington has become the best of the rest in recent weeks.

Husqvarna/J.P Acevedo

– Signing Marshal Weltin for the remainder of the current term has turned out to be an incredible move by the F&H Racing Kawasaki outfit. Weltin contested twenty-eight motos with his previous team, Vamo Honda, and scored thirty-six points in that period. After doing his first four races in green, he has scored forty-three points and surpassed that total. It is likely that he will add a lot to that on the hard-pack of Sevlievo this weekend.

– Marshal Weltin has not managed to beat or match his season-best finish, a fifth at Matterley Basin, yet though. Three riders acquired a season-best finish in this class at the Grand Prix of Switzerland; Anton Gole (thirteenth), Gustavo Pessoa (fourteenth) and Kim Savaste (twentieth). There are some who think that the Swiss event was the first race of the season for Savaste, but he actually contested the MX2 class at Valkenswaard with very little success.

Words: Lewis Phillips | Lead Image: KTM Images/Ray Archer

MXGP World Championship

Brian Bogers to join Fantic Factory Racing MXGP From Riola

Published

on

Brian Bogers Fantic 2024
Brian Bogers scored his first GP podiums in the MX2 class in 2016 and 2017 and made an early switch to the premier class in 2018 at only 21 years of age. After successfully overcoming a string of injuries, it was in 2022 when the Dutchman enjoyed his best season so far. Bogers placed sixth in the MXGP World Championship as one of the top-ranked riders and made his childhood dream come true with a superb GP win in the deep, punishing sand of Lommel, home of Motocross. The 27-year-old from Eindhoven will be looking to achieve more success in Fantic Factory colours.
Brian Bogers:
“I am a very lucky guy at the moment because I never thought that I would still get the chance to race in MXGP this season. Therefore, you can imagine that I don’t only take this opportunity with both hands but with both hands and feet! Thank you to Fantic Factory Racing MXGP for this amazing opportunity, I am very motivated and focused to let this work.”
Louis Vosters, Team Owner:
“Brian Bogers needs no introduction, winning a MXGP overall in Lommel on arguably the most demanding track on the calendar speaks for itself. Together with Fantic and our proven MXGP team, we are sure he can be a regular frontrunner at the top of our sport. The first training sessions have been going well, he is adapting well to the bike and we are looking forward to seeing Brian line up on the Fantic XXF 450 very soon.”
Mariano Roman, CEO Fantic Motor SpA:
“We are thrilled that a stand-out rider like Brian Bogers joins our Fantic family. We have followed his strong performance on track over the last years and we are sure he will make us proud. Alongside his fellow Dutchman Glenn Coldenhoff, we are confident to pull off a great season on our return to the highly competitive MXGP class.”
Continue Reading

MXGP World Championship

2024 Spain Intu Xanadú – Arroyomolinos – MXGP Results

Published

on

We will post the 2024 MXGP results of Spain Intu Xanadú – Arroyomolinos GP all weekend. Get the latest updates to your phone through MX Vice.

MXGP Championship

MXGP Overall

MXGP Race Two

MXGP Race One

MXGP Qualification Race

MXGP Timed Practice

MX2 Championship

MX2 Overall

MX2 – Race Two

MX2 – Race One

MX2 – Qualification Race

MX2 Timed Practice

WMX Race Two

WMX Race One

EMX 250 Overall

EMX 250 – Race 2

EMX 250 – Race 1

EMX 250 – Timed Practice

EMX 250 Practice

Continue Reading

MXGP World Championship

//PEARCY Stats Preview MXGP Intu Xanadu-Arroyomolinos

Published

on

Once again, our resident stats guru, Paul Pearcy, provides a breakdown of the MX2 class going into Intu Xanadu. Famed more for its access to a shopping mall and McDonald’s than actual passing, the MX2 contenders will be looking to make their mark. Last year, Simon Laengenfelder reigned supreme and was unstoppable on Sunday, with no rider able to match his pace. If you were a betting man, who would be your winner?

MXGP Intu Xanadu-Arroyomolinos Preview

MX2

Kay de Wolf

Venue Visits: 21’, 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 3rd
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 3rd
  • Qualifying Race Finish: 4th
  • Qualifying Points: 7
  • Race First Lap Position: 6th
  • Race Finishes: 5th in Race 1, 11th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 8th
  • Race Points: 54

Total Points: 61

Simon Laengenfelder

Venue Visits: 21’-23’

  • Race Podiums: 4; 22’, 23’
  • Race Wins: 2; 1-1 in 23’
  • Overall Podiums: 2; 22’, 23’
  • Overall win: 1; 23’
  • Race Laps Led: 34; all in 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 4.667
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 4th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 3rd
  • Qualifying Points: 8
  • Race First Lap Position: 5.167
  • Race Finishes: 4.333 in Race 1, 5th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 4.333
  • Race Points: 113

Total Points: 121

Thibault Benistant

Venue Visits: 21’-23’

  • Race Podium: 1; 23’
  • Race Laps Led: 1, 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 6.667
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 4th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 5.5
  • Qualifying Points: 5
  • Race First Lap Position: 12.667
  • Race Finishes: 5.667 in Race 1, 6.333 in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 6.333
  • Race Points: 92

Total Points: 97

Mikkel Haarup

Venue Visits: 21’-23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 9th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 12th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 12th
  • Race First Lap Position: 12.5
  • Race Finishes: 12.333 in Race 1, 9.667 in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 10.667
  • Race Points: 60

Total Points: 60

Andrea Adamo

Venue Visits: 21’-23’

  • Race Podium: 1; 23’
  • Overall Podium: 1; 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 11th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 9.5
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 6.5
  • Qualifying Race Points: 6
  • Race First Lap Position: 11.667
  • Race Finishes: 9.333 in Race 1, 12.667 in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 10.333
  • Race Points: 70

Total Points: 76

Lucas Coenen

Venue Visit: 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 6th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 2nd
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 2nd
  • Qualifying Points: 9
  • Race First Lap Position: 17.5
  • Race Finishes: 6th in Race 1, 26th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 14th
  • Race Points: 15

Total Points: 24

Sacha Coenen

Venue Visit: 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 19th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 24th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 17th
  • Race First Lap Position: 8.5
  • Race Finishes: 9th in Race 1, 11th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 9th
  • Race Points: 22

Total Points: 22

Rick Elzinga

Venue Visits: 22’, 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 10th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 14th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 21.5
  • Race First Lap Position: 4.25
  • Race Finishes:13th in Race 1, 10th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 14.5
  • Race Points: 27

Total Points: 27

Jack Chambers

Venue Visit: 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 22nd
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 15th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 15th
  • Race First Lap Position: 24.5
  • Race Finishes:17th in Race 1, 16th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 17th
  • Race Points: 9

Total Points: 9

Oriol Oliver

Venue Visits: 21’, 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 17.5
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 16th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 13th
  • Race First Lap Position: 12.75
  • Race Finishes:17th in Race 1, 17th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 17.5
  • Race Points: 19

Total Points: 19

David Braceras

Venue Visit: 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 16th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 14.5
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 15.5
  • Race First Lap Position: 12.75
  • Race Finishes:14.5 in Race 1, 16th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 16.5
  • Race Points: 23

Total Points: 23

Emil Weckman

Venue Visit: 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 17th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 10th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 11th
  • Race First Lap Position: 12.5
  • Race Finishes: 15th in Race 1, 19th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 18th
  • Race Points: 8

Total Points: 8

Bobby Bruce

Venue Visit: 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 20th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 12th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 26th
  • Race First Lap Position: 23rd
  • Race Finishes: 27th in Race 1, 21st in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 17th

MXGP

Jorge Prado

Venue Visits: 20’-23’

  • 1st in Timed Practice: 1; 22’
  • Qualifying Race Podiums: 2; 22’, 23’
  • Qualifying Race Win: 1; 23’
  • Qualifying Race Laps Led: 12
  • Race Podiums: 6
  • Race Wins: 2
  • Overall Podiums: 2; 20’, 21’
  • Overall Win: 1; 20’ (1-1 in 20’)
  • Race Laps Led: 56

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 3rd
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 2.5
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 1.5
  • Qualifying Race Points: 10
  • Race First Lap Position: 2.125
  • Race Finishes: 2nd in Race 1, 5th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 3rd
  • Race Points: 160

Total Points: 170

Romain Febvre

Venue Visits: 20’, 21’, 23’

  • Race Podiums: 3
  • Race Win: 1; 21’
  • Overall Podium: 1; 20’
  • Race Laps Led: 11

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 5.667
  • Race First Lap Position: 8.5
  • Race Finishes: 1.5 in Race 1, 5th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 3.5
  • Race Points: 81

Total Points: 81

Tim Gajser

Venue Visits: 20’-22’

  • 1st in Timed Practice: 1; 20’
  • Race Podiums: 4
  • Overall Podiums: 2; 20’, 21’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 1.667
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 5th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 11th
  • Race First Lap Position: 3.5
  • Race Finishes: 3rd in Race 1, 3.333 in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 3rd
  • Race Points: 119

Total Points: 119

Pauls Jonass

Venue Visits: 21’, 22’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 8.5
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 3rd
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 9th
  • Race First Lap Position: 7.25
  • Race Finishes: 7.5 in Race 1, 7th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 7.5
  • Race Points: 55

Total Points: 55

Maxime Renaux

Venue Visit: 22’, 23’

  • Race Wins: 2; 22’ (1-1 in 22’)
  • Overall Win: 1; 22’
  • Race Laps Led: 31

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 4th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 5th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 13th
  • Race First Lap Position: 2nd
  • Race Finishes: 1st in Race 1, 1st in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 1st
  • Race Points: 50

Total Points: 50

Jeremy Seewer

Venue Visits: 20’-23’

  • Qualifying Race Podium: 1; 23’
  • Qualifying Race Laps Led: 1; 22’
  • Race Laps Led: 5

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 6.5
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 2nd
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 4th
  • Qualifying Race Points: 8
  • Race First Lap Position: 5.375
  • Race Finishes: 8.5 in Race 1, 5.25 in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 7th
  • Race Points: 115

Total Points: 123

Jeffery Herlings

Venue Visits: 21’, 23’

  • 1st in Timed Practice: 2; 21’, 23’
  • Qualifying Race Podiums: 1; 23’
  • Race Podiums: 4;(Jeffrey has podiumed 100% of the races he has competed in)
  • Race Wins: 3; (Herlings has won 75% of the victories he has vied for)
  • Overall Wins: 2; (100% win rate)
  • Race Laps Led: 27

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 1st
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 2nd
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 2nd
  • Qualifying Race Points: 9
  • Race First Lap Position: 4.75
  • Race Finishes: 2nd in Race 1, 1st in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 1st
  • Race Points: 95

Total Points: 104

Glenn Coldenhoff

Venue Visits: 20’-23’

  • Qualifying Race Win: 1; 22’
  • Qualifying Race Laps Led: 12
  • Race Podium: 1; 22’
  • Overall Podium: 1; 22’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 7.25
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 4th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 3.5
  • Qualifying Race Points: 5
  • Race First Lap Position: 5.125
  • Race Finishes: 6th in Race 1, 6.5 in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 5th
  • Race Points: 123

Total Points: 128

Calvin Vlaanderen

Venue Visits: 20’-23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 12th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 14.5
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 11th
  • Qualifying Race Points: 2
  • Race First Lap Position: 15.625
  • Race Finishes: 11.5 in Race 1, 12.75 in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 12.25
  • Race Points: 71

Total Points: 73

Valentin Guillod

Venue Visits: 20’-23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 18th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 19.5
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 12.5
  • Qualifying Race Points: 1
  • Race First Lap Position: 14.75
  • Race Finishes: 12th in Race 1, 15.25 in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 14.25
  • Race Points: 62

Total Points: 63

Ben Watson

Venue Visits: 21’-23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 14.667
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 20.5
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 24.5
  • Race First Lap Position: 16.5
  • Race Finishes: 19th in Race 1
  • Overall Finishes: 22nd
  • Race Points: 2

Total Points: 2

Ivo Monticelli

Venue Visits: 20’, 22’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 12th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 9th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 24th
  • Race First Lap Position: 16.75
  • Race Finishes: 15th in Race 1, 13th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 13th
  • Race Points: 28

Total Points: 28

Kevin Brumann

Venue Visit: 23’

Averages

  • Timed Practice: 17th
  • Qualifying Race First Lap Position: 20th
  • Qualifying Race Finishes: 20th
  • Race First Lap Position: 20th
  • Race Finishes: 14th in Race 1, 17th in Race 2
  • Overall Finishes: 15th
  • Race Points: 11

Total Points: 11

Photo: KTM Group

Continue Reading

Latest